My mentoring philosophy centers on providing consistent, individually-tailored intra- and extra-curricular guidance and creating strong, community-based support structures, both of which are essential for individuals from marginalized backgrounds to survive and thrive in physics academia. My skills and outlook on being an effective mentor stem from extensive experience with one-on-one mentorship, advocacy for increased representation, and leadership in community-building projects.

 

Consistent, positive, individually-tailored mentorship: As a mentor, I will be a consistently warm and supportive presence in my students’ lives who will prioritize helping them identify and achieve their own unique goals. This requires strong communication skills, like adapting to each student’s unique communication style and actively listening to their needs, and fostering a judgment-free space where they can turn in times of stress. I will value each student as a whole person, not just as a researcher or academic. Furthermore, I believe predominantly positive feedback is much more effective than negative, and I strive to apply this approach as a mentor; students feel most excited when they are lifted up, encouraged, and told they are good at what they are doing.

Strong, community-based support structures: A key role for a mentor is to connect students with community resources that support their personal and academic growth–and to help create these resources if they do not yet exist. I will work to foster a welcoming, collaborative environment for my students, and connect them with affinity groups and other valuable external networks. People thrive when they are part of a community, and I am committed to helping my mentees avoid feelings of isolation.

Supporting mentees from marginalized groups: I strive to be a mentor who actively supports the most marginalized members of academia. In addition to what I described in the preceding sections, I will work towards confronting my harmful implicit biases. I aim to avoid pitfalls like feedback withholding —where essential feedback is unfairly softened or omitted towards minority students—and affinity bias, the tendency to favor those with similar backgrounds, so that all students receive the honest, constructive (yet kind) guidance they deserve